An Argument Stating the Appeasement Was Not Justified in World War II

An Argument Stating the Appeasement Was Not Justified in World War II

Document details
Category: World History and Cultures Essay
Subcategory: U.S. History
Words: 805
Pages: 2

There are two opinions that histories have, when dealing with this question. Some historians say that the appeasement wasn't justified and that Chamberlain was a weak person while of the other hand some say that Chamberlain didn't have any other chose. There are a number of reasons that support both of the sides. Appeasement was justified in a few ways, sympathy for Germany, the desire for peace, the threat of communism and the time to rearm. All of these factors explain how the appeasement was justified. Sympathy for Germany, was an accept that mainly concerned the British. As a matter of fact the British thought that the treaty of Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany. In addition Briton had an opinion that Germany should be treated more fairly. And as a consequence the British gave away on many things that Hitler desired, even when going against treaty of Versailles. For example the British signed the Anglo-German Naval Agreement in 1935. Which allowed Germany to have a navy. Further more The British didn't take any actions when Hitler invaded Rhineland. Subsequently, nothing was done to stop Germany from joining with Austria. The British hoped that Hitler would get satisfied and stop his demands. The desire for peace is the second important factory which makes the appeasement justified. Remembering the First World War, Britain and France didn't want something like this to repeat again. They wanted to keep the world in peace. People from these countries didn't want another war and hoped that the League of Nations would have the power to settle quarrels between countries. Furthermore there was the Great Depression that put many countries into a position, where they simply couldn't afford a war. The Threat of communism, also explains why the appeasement was justified. The biggest problem was the Briton and France couldn't protect many of the countries from Hitler. For example Czechoslovakia and Poland are two good examples of counties that...

“A good sample is better than the advice"
Hire EliteEssayWriters to Write Your Assignment!
similar examples
An Argument in Favor of the Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II
1405 words
6 pages
The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were without a doubt the mostviolent and devastating acts of war this planet has ever seen. Suddenly,and without warning, hundreds of city blocks were reduced to molten rubble.How could the United States have committed such an act? Although a terribleand violent crime, I believe ...
An Argument That World War I Could Have Been Prevented
491 words
1 pages
The World War I was something that no one wanted to happen, but of course the suffering and deaths and economic consequences were about to be terrible.In each country the political military leaders did things that led to a mobilization and declarations of war, or didn't do things and because ...
An Argument in Favor of the Justification of the Use of the Atomic Bomb in World War II
1566 words
2 pages
Many questions lie within the history of the United States of America. Was there a second gunman involved in the assassination of JFK? Did we really go to the moon? Who really framed Roger Rabbit? All of these questions, valid or not, can be proven by facts and logistics. One ...
An Argument in Favor of the Atomic Bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima during the World War Two
1553 words
2 pages
Many questions lie within the history of the United States of America. Was there a second gunman involved in the assassination of JFK? Did we really go to the moon? Who really framed Roger Rabbit? All of these questions, valid or not, can be proven by facts and logistics. One ...
An Argument Against USA Not Joining The League of Nations During the First World War
622 words
1 pages
As Americans survived the aftermath of the Great War, they were faced with yet another puzzle whether to join the League of Nations or not. The League of Nations was largely the brainchild of US President Woodrow Wilson, and the narrow-minded Republicans who shot it down were acting solely in ...
An Argument in Favor of the Idea That the Treaty of Versailles Was a Root Cause of World War II
405 words
1 pages
I agree to a large extent that the Treaty of Versailles and other peace settlements that followed World War I, were the root causes of World War II. However, there was also other factor that caused World War II. The treaty of Versailles was designed to humiliate the Germans as ...
GET EVEN A BETTER ESSAY!
It's a lifetime discount time!
15% off
Save this discount code:
15OFFJUST4U